Being Relieved of the Watch

Standing in the Order is losable. That’s not a flaw — it’s the source of its weight. “What we earn, we can lose.”

The principle

The grounds and the process for removal are as public as the bar to get in. A member can be relieved, but never by a black box. Publicly de-listing someone with no visible due process is exactly the kind of weapon we refuse to build — it would turn removal into a tool for grudges. Specific deliberations may be private; the rules cannot be.

What you can lose, and what you can’t

Once you are a member, you are a member. Your past earned you that, and it is not taken back lightly. What rises and falls is your active standing, not your belonging:

Any decision to revoke a Charge or to cast someone out runs on published grounds and a Decision Record, and the member always has a right of reply.

The cast-out process

Casting someone out is the gravest thing the Order does, so it runs on a careful, public process:

  1. Raising it. Any member may bring a claim that another has broken a moral to the relevant sect council, with grounds.
  2. The hearing. The council hears it on published grounds. The accused has a full right of reply — to see the claim and answer it — before any decision.
  3. The decision. Because casting out is final, it takes a two-thirds majority of the council, not a simple one.
  4. Appeal. The decision can be appealed to the next tier up, and is subject to the same checks as any decision (see governance) — including the members’ and lower councils’ override.
  5. The record. A public Decision Record is issued; the member’s page is quietly removed.

Revoking a Charge (rather than casting out) follows the same shape at a simple majority — grounds, right of reply, a Decision Record — but costs only that watch, never membership.